Against the backdrop of recent parliamentary and presidential elections, there is growing concern, both domestically and abroad, about Slovakia's perceived drift away from European values and norms and towards Russia. As the governing coalition parties unveil their candidates, scrutiny mounts over the presence of controversial figures among them. While delving into each candidate's background would, unfortunately, take too much time, the aim and focus will be to spotlight some of the most notable names, particularly focusing on the major parties represented in the Slovakian Parliament.

Behind the Coalition Curtain: Revealing Controversial Figures in Slovakia's Political Landscape

As Slovakia's most influential parties currently unite in coalition (Smer-SD, Hlas-SD, and SNS), the selection of candidates reveals notable controversy. The Smer party list is led by Monika Beňová, an incumbent MEP. Beňová, previously aligned with S&D, faced suspension alongside two other coalition parties by the PES Group due to divergence from socialist principles.

Reasons for suspension included perceived pro-Russian leanings, anti-LGBTQ rhetoric, and disregard for the rule of law. In the second slot is Ľuboš Blaha, a party member and vice-chairman of the Slovakian Parliament, renowned for his staunch pro-Russian stance. His book on Lenin underscores this sentiment, portraying Slovakia as inhospitable to communism adherents. Occupying fourth place is Judita Laššáková, embroiled in controversy for co-hosting a YouTube podcast with Daniel Bombic, known for espousing antisemitic and neo-Nazi ideologies.

The Hlas party, a constituent of the governing coalition, lacks representation in the European Parliament. While the party's candidates remained undisclosed for a considerable duration, the lineup is now spearheaded by Branislav Becík, chairperson of the Nitra Region and a member of the National Council. According to party chairman Peter Pellegrini, their agenda prioritizes advocating for farmers' rights and opposing the perceived adverse impacts of the Green Deal.

The final coalition member, the Slovak National Party, seeks European Parliament representation under the leadership of its chairman, Andrej Danko, who includes himself and other current ministers on the candidate roster. While some ministers have already hinted at abstaining from European parliamentary mandates if elected, they defended their inclusion on the list as boosting the image of the political party. Notably, Martina Šimkovičová, the incumbent Minister of Culture, sparks controversy both domestically and in Brussels for her alleged attempts to curb media freedom in Slovakia. However, given her current ministerial role, it is highly unlikely that she would assume a parliamentary mandate even if elected.

 

Leading the Opposition: Progressive Slovakia's Nomination Strategy

The largest opposition party, Progressive Slovakia, nominated Ľudovít Ódor, former governor of the National Bank, and also the prime minister of a bureaucratic government, as the number one candidate. He is accompanied by Ľubica Karvašová, a former diplomat, member of the Permanent Representation of the SR to the EU, and advisor to the prime minister on EU affairs. Martin Hojsík is the Vice-President of the European Parliament and represents Progressive Slovakia in the Renew Europe group. The first five candidates also include current MEP Michal Wiezik.

Debating Slovakia's European Direction

Slovakia has undergo 2 crucial elections in the past year that shaped its image in front of the world. With candidates spanning a spectrum from pro-Russian to those embroiled in accusations of antisemitism, the electoral stage is set for a spirited debate on the nation's direction in Europe.

While some candidates attract attention with their affiliations and statements, others offer promising prospects. Parties such as Progressive Slovakia have nominated notable figures like Ľudovít Ódor and Ľubica Karvašová, presenting a leadership vision based on experience and pragmatism.

In past European Elections, Slovakians have typically leaned towards center-right or center-left parties, often due to higher youth turnout. This trend could potentially benefit Progressive Slovakia and Hlas. Hlas has pursued a cautious strategy in both nominations and debates, aiming to appeal to voters across the political spectrum. Their list of nominees lacks controversial figures compared to Smer, and they have tended to steer clear of politically sensitive topics, maintaining a centrist stance. However, should Smer gain significant support in the European runoff, there's a possibility that Hlas may adjust its approach and align with Smer in the European Parliament, potentially shifting towards a more right-leaning position.

In the face of polarization and sensationalism, it is crucial for voters to navigate through the noise and evaluate each candidate's platform and character. The European Parliament elections represent not just a choice for Slovakia's representation in Brussels but a referendum on the values and aspirations of its people.